Thinking, Doing, and Governing Revolution in Post-Coup Myanmar

Type

Double Panel

Part 1

Session 11
Thu 12:00-13:30 Classroom B52

Part 2

Session 12
Thu 15:00-16:30 Sala de Juntas

Conveners

Discussant

Save This Event

Add to Calendar

Part 1

Part 2

Show Paper Abstracts

Abstract

This double panel examines how revolutionary actors are increasingly engaged in practices of governance and sovereignty-making in areas beyond junta control. The 2021 coup triggered widespread popular resistance across Myanmar society: civil servants walked out; students and youth took to barricades; and whole peri-urban communities rose up to fight for social and political gains made in the 2010s. Women openly challenged patriarchal structures, and some in the Bamar majority confronted historical injustices toward ethnic minorities. Alongside demands to remove the military from power, many articulated aspirations for a society grounded in social justice, ethnic equality, and inclusive governance.
More than four years on, these aspirations remain to be realised. Despite sustained violence, humanitarian crisis, and the Myanmar military’s continued backing from powerful international actors, this period is also notable for the persistence of revolutionary aspirations, the emergence of transnational solidarities and new governance practices that challenge settler-colonial frameworks. Grassroots activists continue to mobilise and innovate inside Myanmar while diaspora led advocacy and cross border student networks have kept democratic demands visible on the international stage despite intensified repression. The junta’s inability to govern the majority of the country has created an unprecedented political and administrative vacuum in which new armed resistance groups, existing Ethnic Resistance Organizations (EROs), and civil society groups are experimenting with alternative forms of authority, service provision, and sovereignty.
Bringing these dynamics together, this double panel examines how revolution in Myanmar is being thought, practiced, and governed across local, national, and transnational spaces to deepen our understanding of how revolutionary movements sustain themselves, adapt to changing circumstances, and pursue transformative societal goals. What ideas animate revolutionary practices in Myanmar since the 2021 military coup d’état and how do they variously draw upon or depart from those of earlier periods? In the absence of international and regional intervention, how have grassroots resilience, diaspora advocacy, and transnational activism have become vital political forces? What do the experiences of the past five years reveal about the possibilities for indigenous and ethnic self-governance beyond settler-colonial frameworks, especially in light of the recent military-administered elections? These are among the questions that we seek to address.

Keywords