Reimagining Climate Finance in Southeast Asia: Gender, Power, and the Politics of Climate Actions
Type
Single PanelSchedule
Session 9Wed 18:30-20:00 Classroom B 51
Convener
- Irma Nugrahanti International Institute of Social Studies
Save This Event
Add to CalendarPapers
-
Who really benefits from agrisolar? Power, markets, and smallholder farmers in the Philippines
Carl Vincent Gapasin Department of Agriculture
Manuel De Vera Asian Institute of Management
Novee Grace Nalica ACWA Power
Shunie Pearl Palacios Peace and Equity Foundation
The rapid expansion of utility-scale solar power plants in the Philippines is intensifying competition for agricultural land, raising concerns for food system resilience, smallholder livelihoods, and equitable land use. While climate finance has become central to the issue of just transition, the arrangements are often shaped by market-oriented approaches, with limited empirical evidence on how such models may affect smallholder-based markets for farmers in developing contexts.
This study examines a proposed agrisolar (agrivoltaic) enterprise model in Cabayugan, Puerto Princesa, Palawan, designed for deployment within an existing solar microgrid power plant that operates under the Philippine government’s missionary electrification framework. The proposed model introduces agricultural production beneath and around established photovoltaic infrastructure that positions agrisolar as a dual-use strategy that optimizes land use without displacing energy generation. The study employs a participatory approach via engagement with farmer associations, local government units, private sector actors, and the generation company responsible for the microgrid operations, combined with methods on value-chain analysis, agro-climatic assessment and financial modeling.
Results from technical and financial assessments suggest that shade-tolerant, high-value crops could be cultivated under photovoltaic systems that potentially stabilize yields and reduce production risks. When combined with cooperative-led aggregation and institutional buyer linkages, the model is expected to enhance market participation and support income streams diversification. However, the proposed structure reflects the significant influence of private and energy-sector actors, which may constrain decision-making power among smallholder farmers.
Overall, the study presents agrisolar as a viable pathway for strengthening agricultural market systems and improving livelihood resilience, though the need for a more balanced governance arrangements in climate finance design vis-à-vis farmers’ rights. -
A Feminist Political Economy Analysis of Gender-Responsive Climate Budgeting in Indonesia
Irma Nugrahanti International Institute of Social Studies
Gender mainstreaming in climate budgeting is an important aspect of equitable climate governance, yet its implementation is hindered by entrenched political, institutional, and socioeconomic barriers. This paper investigates these dynamics in Indonesia, focusing on how structural factors, such as institutional arrangements, power relations, and social hierarchies, along with prevailing ideologies and agency, shape the barriers to incorporating gender considerations into climate finance at multiple levels of government. Drawing on frameworks from feminist economics and political economy, the research views gender-responsive climate budgeting as a complicated political process that is ingrained in broader power dynamics, resource distributions, and social norms rather than as a technical exercise in public financial management. Climate budgeting represents a significant part of the broader challenge associated with achieving equitable green transitions. Technocratic approaches prioritize efficiency, growth, and infrastructural investments, whereas feminist economics highlights the overlooked aspects of social reproduction and differentiated vulnerabilities. The political economy viewpoint provides explanatory insight by demonstrating how institutional frameworks, incentive system and political support influence the priority or marginalization of gender-responsive climate budgeting. Empirical findings from this study illustrate this interaction across governance levels.
The study utilises a multi-level qualitative approach, drawing on national and subnational budget documents, key informant interviews, and case studies of selected areas that are implementing gender-responsive climate budgeting initiatives. This methodology allows for an investigation of how local interpretations, adaptations, or resistance to national mandates occur, as well as the ways in which feminist economic concerns about social reproduction, equality, and care connect with political economy processes.
The research argues, using political economy and feminist economics, that gender-responsive climate budgeting in Indonesia faces not only technical and knowledge gap challenges, but also deeper institutional, ideological, and political challenges. Together, they offer a more comprehensive framework to design gender-responsive climate strategies, advancing Indonesia’s green and just transition.
Abstract
Climate finance has become a fundamental component of both national and international responses to the climate crisis. In Southeast Asia, the allocation of climate funding is often influenced by power imbalance, political interests, gender-blind policy instruments, and persistent colonial legacies in development finance. This panel examines how climate finance, encompassing state budgets, international climate funds, and private sector investments, both influences and is influenced by the wider political, economic, and social landscapes in the area.
Utilizing critical development studies, feminist economics, and decoloniality, the panel poses the following question:
• How do gendered power structures, historical and systemic inequalities influence access to climate finance?
• What role do national budgets, donors, and multilateral institutions play in shaping priorities?
• How are Indigenous, local, and community-led climate solutions funded, or excluded?
• What alternative models exist for financing equitable and just climate transitions?
Panelists will utilize case studies from Southeast Asia countries to examine how climate financing may either perpetuate existing disparities or function as an instrument for transformational justice. The panel seeks to redefine climate financing as not just technical or economic tool, but also political process, where decisions over distribution, recognition, and involvement influence the region’s climate futures.

